Starter
- Small monthly placement count
- Publisher shortlist approval
- Contextual body links
- Full evidence report
- Scheduled re-checks
A link building programme built around evidence rather than volume promises.
Link building has a reputation problem, and mostly it earns it. The industry rewards speed, and speed rewards shortcuts. We took the opposite position: a slower pipeline, a smaller monthly ceiling, and a review step that occasionally kills a placement we have already paid for. It costs us margin and it keeps the results defensible.
Before anything is placed we map what your profile already looks like and where it is lopsided. The plan then fills the gaps rather than piling more of the same anchors on top.
Longer campaigns built around something worth writing about — original data, a strong opinion, a tool. Slower to start, but the coverage tends to keep arriving after the campaign ends.
If the page you want to build links to is not worth linking to yet, we will say so, and we can help fix it. Building links to a thin page is money spent teaching people the page is thin.
Site moves are where profiles quietly bleed out. We map the old link targets, watch the redirects and chase the publishers whose links broke in the process.
Nothing in the report is a score we invented. Where we quote a third-party metric we name the tool and the date it was pulled, because those numbers move and a figure without a date is decoration.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
By default yes, and the report states the attribute for every placement. A natural profile contains a mix, so we do not treat a nofollow from a strong publisher as a failure.
We do, to the publisher's brief. If you would rather supply drafts, we will edit them to the publisher's standard before submission.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the page. We will look at it and give you an honest read on whether publishers will take it.
You always do. Nothing is pitched to a site you have not seen and signed off. If you want to be involved in the drafting as well, that is fine too.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
Often, yes. It usually starts with an audit and an unhappy conversation, and the first phase is subtraction rather than addition.
A profile audit on its own is worthwhile and plenty of people stop there. For placements, anything under a few months tends not to tell you much either way.
For anyone who wants the reasoning rather than the pitch, most of it has been written up over at:
The first step is always the audit, and it stands on its own — plenty of people take the audit, act on it themselves, and we never hear from them again. That is a perfectly good outcome.